Examples of college essay prompts collegeboard
Darkness is essential to humans. Here, Bogard talks about the importance of darkness to humans. Humans need darkness to sleep in order to be healthy. Animals also need darkness. Ecological light pollution is like the bulldozer of the night, wrecking habitat and disrupting ecosystems several billion years orompts the making. Here Bogard explains that animals, too, need darkness to survive. Overall, this response demonstrates partially successful reading comprehension.
The response demonstrates no understanding of the continue reading task. Instead, the writer merely cites two sentences from the passage, and offers a brief restatement of each point. Overall, this paper demonstrates inadequate analysis. This essay demonstrates little cohesion and inadequate skill collefeboard the use and control of language. Overall, this essay does not provide enough evidence of writing ability to warrant a score higher than a 1.
His essay talks about so much facts about sleeping how so little can effect us health wise examples like getting sleep disorders, diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression. This facts helps people persuade the audience he also say that the world health organization classifies working night shift is bad. In his argument is not all about how it bad for the body he also claims and have proof that light cost essxy expensive and really costing people because they have light all night long.
He also claims light is messing with mother nature that animals need darkness to feed eat move around because there noctuaral creatures. He has details facts about human body, animals and about mother nature that he can use to support his idea of not using so much collefe at night and coklege we need darkness. With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for us.
He was all of facts and examples that he claim is efficting us and there world. On the whole, this essay displays only a partial understanding of the source text. This facts helps people persuade the audience. Other than identifying these as persuasive facts, however, the writer does nothing to indicate an understanding of the analytical task. The writer again mentions persuasion before the conclusion of the essay With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for usbut once again, there is no explanation of how or why these features are persuasive.
This response demonstrates little cohesion and inadequate skill in the use and control of language. The response also lacks a recognizable introduction and conclusion, and sentences are strung together without a clear progression of ideas for much of the response, the writer merely lists claims Bogard makes. The response also lacks variety in sentence ezamples, in part because of repetitive transitions. For example, he also claims is used two sentences in a row in this brief response.
Weak control of the conventions of standard written English, coupled with vague word choice, undermine the quality of writing. Overall, this response has demonstrated inadequate writing skill. Bogard uses many features such as touch, feeling, seeing or even our own senses. One of the senses Bogard uses within his essay is touch. He concludes that many species depend on the darkness. Darkness tends to evolve all over the world for a variety of things.
Another sense that Bogard uses is feeling. He compares the rythm into which light and dark days exist. Many medical centers have concluded that are bodies need darkness to produce many different hormones and see more continue with processes to keep us alive. Paul shows how many different characteristics affect how important darkness is to a human body.
I think that this topic Bogard uses appeals to emotion to many different religious groups. Giving evidence of a historical artist Van Gogh adds a lot of emotion to essag particular essay. Comparing how cities and towns collegeboad the world are changing thier ways of light is going to be wasted.
Collegeboard prompts college examples of essay doing that
He uses a lot of evidence with emotion. Providing a variety of different examples on how darkness should be perserved gives a lot of power to the ideas that are expressed. This response demonstrates some understanding of the source text. This writer provides a limited analysis of the source text. However, the writer is unable to express how Bogard uses these elements specifically. For example, in the first paragraph, the writer claims that One of the dxamples Bogard uses within his essay is touch, but none of the ensuing discussion relates to touch at all.
Instead, the writer merely goes on to summarize that Bogard concludes that many species depend on the darkness. The writer seems to have a sense of the form that analysis should take, but this response demonstrates ineffective analysis overall. This response demonstrates limited cohesion and skill in the use and control of language. In this essay, organization and language errors such as syntactically click the following article sentences and sentence fragments detract from the quality of the writing and often impede understanding, leading to a score of 2.
Bogard begins his argument by first providing a story from his personal experience, appealing to the reader by adding imagery. This example gives Bogard a sense of voice and his use of o is definitely effective. This writer demonstrates some comprehension of the passage. However, this is the last evidence of understanding the writer provides, as the essay ends almost immediately afterward.
Overall, the writer has demonstrated partial understanding of the source text. The response offers some limited analysis of the source text, demonstrating partial understanding of the analytical task. However, the writer does not elaborate on this point. In each instance of analysis in this short response, the writer identifies the use of evidence or rhetorical features, but asserts rather than explains the primpts of those elements.
Overall, this response demonstrates partially successful analysis. This response demonstrates limited cohesion and some skill in the use of promprs. Although the writer offers a central claim that guides the essay, there is no indication of an introduction or conclusion to frame ideas. Overall, sentences are clear and the writer generally observes the conventions of standard written English. However, by the end of this short response, the writer has deviated from a formal style and objective tone Oh, no! On the whole, this response offers some evidence of cohesion and control of language.
Bogard builds his arguement in a few different ways. By using a personal story Bogard allows his audience to connect to him. If his audience can relate or even understand his story they will be more willing to agree with him. In his personal story Bogard uses great imagery making the audience picture what he saw and maybe make them want to experience it too. By stating collegeboaed people who are younger then 35 might feel that they were robbed of the oppurtunity to experience the real beauty of natural darkness.
This would proably help his younger audience to agree with him because they might want the chance to see the real beauty of natural darkness. Bogard writes about the benefits that natural darkness actually produces. In the article he talks about how darkens actually helps the body produce a hormone that keeps certain cancers from developing. He also includes how darkness helps exxmples is neccessary for certain animals. These examples will help his audience see that he is arguing for some benefical for people. This also helps appeal to an audience that might not care for the beauty of darkness but care for their own personal health.
Bogard uses different features in order to persuade his audience. The different features also help him in appealing to a broader audience. This response demonstrates effective understanding of the passage, with increasing evidence as the response continues. In the next paragraph, the writer cites and discusses a generational claim that Bogard makes, again demonstrating comprehension.
Nevertheless, in this example and others like it in the response, the writer exhibits effective analysis of the source text using relevant and sufficient support. This essay is mostly cohesive and demonstrates mostly effective control of language. The essay then follows a clear, if formulaic, format. Sentence rxamples is varied, and some precise phrasing is used to convey ideas robbed of the oppurtunity, their own personal health.
Language control on the whole is good, although there are a few minor errors These examples will help his audience see that he is arguing for some benefical for people that do not detract materially from the quality of writing. Examplds, the response demonstrates proficient writing. In order to prove the need for natural darkness, Bogard divides his argument into three main topics, saying that natural darkness is beneficial to humans, essential to humans, and essential to ecosystems. According to Bogard, natural darkness can be a positive help to humans.
One of the ways it can accomplish this is by giving enjoyment to onlookers. To supplant this, Bogard gives a personal example of how he enjoyed seeing meteors dart across the night sky in Minnesota as a child. Also he states that natural darkness can be a source of solitude. Supporting this claim, Bogard states that darkness is invaluable to every religion.
Additionally Bogard says that the night sky has inspired countless numbers of philosophers, artists, go here stargazers for millennia. Bogard then gives a scientific case that shows why natural darkness is essential to humans.
He points to the necessity of darkness in producing melatonin, a hormone that helps prevent certain cancers from developing in the human body. Bogard then concludes his argument that darkness is essential to human well-being by analyzing sleep. He first makes the obvious claim that darkness is essential for sleep. Then, he talks about the negative health effects of sleep disorders. He notes that there are a variety of nocturnal and crepuscular species of birds, fish, mammals, insects, and reptiles worldwide.
He gives two specific, well-known examples of these species; these discussed the species of North American birds that migrate at collegdboard and the sea turtles that lay their examplfs on the shore at night. He also gives a couple of lesser-known examples, involving bats and moths that show the positive actions that some nocturnal animals perform.
He then concludes his argument for nocturnal darkness necessary to nature with persuasion, saying that removing natural darkness would essentially destroy an ecology that took billions of years to develop. Here, Bogard uses scientific fact to prove that natural darkness is a key to nature and ecology.
Paul Bogard supports the preservation of natural darkness. He uses an argument to support his position that has three primary points—benefit to humans, need for humans and need for nature. The essau provides various details from the text that support these points. The writer also sees the connection between darkness as a source of solitude and it inspiring countless numbers of philosophers, artists, and stargazers for millennia.
The writer instead consistently lapses into summary. Overall, the response demonstrates inadequate analysis. This mostly cohesive response demonstrates effective use and control of language. The writer presents an effective introduction with a clear central claim that lays out the three points discussed in the response In order to prove the need for natural darkness, Bogard divides his argument into three main topics, saying that natural darkness is beneficial to humans, essential to humans, and essential to the ecosystem.
The response also includes an generally effective conclusion that summarizes rather than advances the essay Paul Bogard supports the preservation of natural darkness. He uses an argument to support his position that has three primary points—benefit to humans, need for humans and need for nature although the conclusion is not marked off by a paragraph break.
The response is organized clearly around the three points identified in the introduction, and each body paragraph stays on-topic. The writer also demonstrates a clear progression of ideas both within paragraphs and throughout the essay. Sentence structure tends to be repetitive and simple, however. For example, at or near the end of each body paragraph, the writer restates the point that introduces that paragraph Bogard then gives a scientific case that shows why natural darkness is essential to humans Bogard uses scientific evidence to support his belief in the preservation of natural darkness.
Although the writing in this response is xeamples, it does not demonstrate the sentence variety, precise word choice, or highly effective progression of ideas that is expected at the advanced level. With light providing as such a huge factor in daily life, we sometimes forget that darkness can have more healing abilities, and allows nature to return to a nonartificial, primitive state. Bogard uses personal observation for credibility, stirring feelings, and startling facts to deliver a powerful argument. Throughout the passage, Bogard remains nostalgic about his childhood: I knew night skies in which meteors left smoky prompfs across sugary spreads of stars Bogard knows the power of darkness and through his childhood memories, we lean our ears to listen to him.
Even though credibility makes many appearences throughout the passage, it would have no real meaning without evoking emotion. We finally see the true importance of allowing our world to temporarily succumb to darkness. Through the emotion Bogard evokes, we suddenly feel defensive in preserving the darkness for the sake of our mental and physical health. Bogard even makes us think about the future generations: Who knows what this vision of the night sky must inspire in each of us, in our children or grandchildren? Bogard has completed his research, and uses it to further his case: Much of this light is wasted energy, which collegge wasted dollars.
However, upper-middle-class collegeboard essay examples college of prompts think that
Those of us over 35 are perhaps among the last generation to have known truly dark nights. Bogard builds up our world, and then breaks it down in our minds with his writing: Easay must see the strength and beauty in the darkness, and remember how our world survived without lights. Light can be acceptable, but too much of it can prove worse than permanent darkness. The writer captures the central idea of the source passage the importance of allowing more darkness to fill the eesay for distinct health and ecological reasons and accurately quotes and paraphrases many important details from the passage.
Moreover, the writer demonstrates an understanding of how these ideas and details interrelate. Bogard extends the facts to offer various solutions. The response is free of errors of fact and interpretation. Overall, this response demonstrates advanced prrompts comprehension. The writer demonstrates an understanding of the analytical task by analyzing three ways Bogard builds his argument personal observation for credibility, stirring feelings, and startling facts to deliver a powerful argument.
The writer demonstrates highly effective use and command of language in this cohesive response. The response includes a precise central claim Bogard uses personal observation for credibility, stirring feelings, and startling facts to deliver a powerful argument colpege, and each of the subsequent paragraphs remains focused on one of the topics set forth in that central claim.
There is a deliberate progression of ideas both within paragraphs and throughout the response. Moreover, the response demonstrates precise word choice and sophisticated turns of phrase temporarily succumb to darkness, remains nostalgic about his childhood, dissolves any doubt. The concluding paragraph develops the essay rather than just restating what has been said and is also successful for its precise word choice and complex sentence structures We must see the strength and beauty in the darkness, and remember how our world survived without lights.
Although there are occasional missteps where the writer overreaches with language In order to achieve proper credibility and stir emotion, undeniable facts must reside in the passageoverall, this response demonstrates advanced writing skill. He effectively builds his argument by using a personal anecdote, allusions to art and history, and rhetorical questions. By drawing in his readers with a personal encounter about night darkness, the author means to establish the potential for beauty, glamour, and awe-inspiring mystery that genuine darkness can possess.
This urges the readers to weigh the disadvantages of our world consumed by unnatural, vapid lighting. He then goes on to state how Paris has taken steps to exercise more sustainable lighting practices. This furthers his line exanples argumentation because it shows how steps can be and are being taken to preserve natural darkness.
It shows that even a city that is literally famous for being constantly lit can practically address light pollution in a manner that preserves the beauty of both the city itself and the universe as a whole. Finally, Colleeg makes subtle yet efficient use of rhetorical questioning to persuade his audience that natural darkness preservation is essential. By asking this question, Bogard draws out heartfelt ponderance from his readers about the affecting power of an untainted night sky. This strategy is definitively an appeal to pathos, forcing the audience to directly face an emotionally-charged inquiry that will surely spur some kind of response.
By doing this, Bogard develops his argument, adding gutthral power to the idea that the issue of maintaining natural darkness is relevant and multifaceted.
This writer provides a limited analysis of the source text. He has details facts about human body, examples of college essay prompts collegeboard and about mother nature that he can use to support his idea of not using so much light at night and how we need darkness. On the whole, this essay displays only a partial understanding of the source text. The response is free of errors of fact and interpretation. By using a personal story Bogard allows his audience to connect to him. Each response has received a separate score for each of the three domains assessed: Introduction The directions below are representative of what students will encounter on test day. One of the ways it can accomplish this is by giving enjoyment to onlookers.
Writing as a reaction to his disappointment that artificial light has largely permeated the prescence of natural darkness, Paul Bogard argues that we must preserve true, unaffected darkness. He builds this claim by making use of a personal anecdote, allusions, and rhetorical questioning. This response demonstrates thorough comprehension of the source text through collegebiard use of paraphrases and direct quotations. The response is also free of errors of fact or interpretation. Overall, the response demonstrates advanced reading comprehension. This response offers an insightful analysis of the source text and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the analytical task.
For example, collegfboard writer offers a possible reason for why Bogard chose to open his argument with a personal anecdote, and is also able fxamples describe the overall effect of that choice on his audience In telling this brief anecdote, Bogard challenges the audience to remember a time where they could fully amass themselves in natural darkness void of artificial light. By drawing in his readers with a personal encounter This type of insightful analysis is evident throughout the response and indicates advanced analytical skill.
The response is cohesive and demonstrates highly effective use and command of language. There is a clear, deliberate progression of ideas within paragraphs and throughout the response. There is a consistent use of both precise word choice and well-chosen turns of phrase the natural magnificence of stars in a dark sky is definite, our world consumed by unnatural, vapid lighting, the affecting power of an untainted night sky.
- Comparing how cities and towns across the world are changing thier ways of light is going to be wasted.
- Each response has received a separate score for each of the three domains assessed:
- The response offers some limited analysis of the source text, demonstrating partial understanding of the analytical task.
The response demonstrates a strong command of the conventions of written English. Overall, the response exemplifies advanced article source proficiency.